Some expectation about election 2011

At present DMDK alliance with ADMK has been confirmed. So, DMK is in necessity to alliance with Congress to face the election. This is good time for Congress to demand. Moreover, the alliance is not the necessity for Congress but for DMK it is so. Even if Congress stands alone, though it may lose in almost all constituency, it does not affect Congress much. But it affects DMK a lot. This paves way for ADMK to get majority.

Even if Congress-DMK alliance is confirmed, there are more chances for the ADMK, and its alliance to win the election. To increase the chance for ADMK she needs to allocate appropriate nominees for the constituencies. This is where she lost in previous election. If Congress-DMK is confirmed, they will try all means to win over the election. Having Government servants in their hands, they may try some malpractices in the election. But beyond that there are chances for ADMK to win.

There is less chance for ADMK to get majority. She needs the help of DMDK to form Government. This is the right time for Captain to place his demands. He can ask for one or two ministers from his party which must be confirmed before election. It is not good to believe in Jayalalitha after election.

As confidence in DMK has been reduced with the people due to the growth of their family and other problems like 2G, power cut, etc there is less chance for them to win provided the election was honest.

Vijayakanth must be careful with Jayalalitha, for he should not be made like other alliance parties like Vai Ko(MDMK), or Tha Pandian(Communist). This is a better chance for him to develop faith on him in minds of people. According to me BJP cannot get anything without making alliance. Its alliance with ADMK is welcome as it may increase the strength of ADMK, to some extent.

I feel BJP is the best party but it cannot get votes alone. It needs to earn fame as of TN is concerned. For that it requires a good leader which is missing over here.

If DMK did not accept the demands of Congress there are chances for Congress to pull DMDK to form alliance which should not happen. That may make the result favorable for none. Moreover DMK will not allow such things to happen.

As of now we can expect ADMK and its alliance to win the election, but ADMK getting majority is a question. But as of now ADMK can concentrate on defeating DMK. She can also get majority if she is careful in its nominee in each constituency, that they must have some votes for themselves rather than ADMK. As I already said, this is where she lost in previous election

TN should get freed from DMK is the very requirement as of now to people. Congress is as equally dangerous as DMK.

Jaihind

Manmadhan Ambu

"Manmadhan Ambu"-I feel the title is logical after seeing the movie.

Man=Mannar(Kamal)
Madhan=Madhanagopal(Madhavan)
Ambu=Ambujakshi(Trisha)

A good entertainment, with right mix of comedy which is natural. I think many would have said so about the movie. But I would like to say something different.

Madhavan, a bussiness man from a Brahmin family and Trisha, an actress with name screen name Nisha, loves each other. The film opens so. Madhavan, is pictured as the one who doubts Trisha, and drinks. Madhavan's mother makes such a feeling in Madhavan to avoid Trisha.

Kamal shows this in almost all of his films - Panchathandiram, Pammal K Sambandham, etc. Creating a Brahmin character in his movies and showing bad about them. Can't he take the film without a mention about caste. Why should he create such impression about a particular community of the society?

Madhavan showed as a full time drunk is a Brahmin. Madhavan's mother who tries to avoid Trisha by making Madhavan doubt Trisha. He appoints a detective to watch over her. Will Kamal dare to make such a movie with the role of Madhavan as a Muslim, or Christian? He will not even dare to show them as any other community of Hindus, like Devars, etc. I too don't ask for it. He can show such characters without any mention about the community. But he does not do so. In all of his films he is showing Brahmins in such role.

The film ends with the pair Madhavan-Sangeetha, and Kamal-Trisha. Yes, it should be so. Madhavan-Trisha pair is not correct because both are Brahmins. According to Kamal, it should be shown as a Brahmin marrying a non Brahmin. I do not say that he should not do so. I ask why he is always targeting Brahmins. Will he dare to show any other community of the society with such characters repeatedly in all of his films?  No. Because, it would be a problem for him if he targets any other community. But he can say anything about Brahmins.

Please do not watch such movies in theatres and make profit for them. Doing so will encourage them. If required watch in DVDs, or download from the internet. Let such films be a flop in theatre. At least then they will take movies in neutral.

Most of the media supporting DMK

Visit the following site, and continue reading this post:
http://thatstamil.oneindia.in/news/2011/02/07/vijaykanth-is-right-asking-dy-cm-post-from-admk-aid0090.html

"முன்னர் செல்வி ஜெயலலிதா, முதல்வரான போது நள்ளிரவில் கருணாநிதி கைது செய்யப்பட்டார். அதனை நாடே கண்டித்தது. அப்போது மத்தியில் பி.ஜே.பி. ஆட்சி. பிரதமராக வாஜ்பாய் வீற்றிருந்தார். தேசத்தின் மூத்த தலைவர் ஒருவர் நள் ளிரவில் ஒரு கைதியைப்போல் இழுத்துச் சென்றதை தொலைக்காட்சியில் கண்ணுற்ற அவர் மனம் கலங்கிப்போனார்"...

கைதியை போல் அல்ல. கைது செய்தால் கைதி தான். ராஜ மரியாதையுடன் அழைத்து சென்று பாராட்டு விழா நடத்தவா முடியும்?

"தி.மு.க. கூட்டணிக்குக் கண்களுக்குத் தெரியாத மிகப்பெரும் வலிமை இருக்கிறது. அந்த வலிமைதான் மக்கள் செல்வாக்கு. கடந்த ஐந்து ஆண்டுகளில் கருணாநிதி அரசு செய்த மக்கள் நலப்பணிகள் அரசியல், கட்சி எல்லைகளை உடைத்துக் கொண்டு அந்த மகத்தான செல்வாக்கை தி.மு.கவுக்கு தேடித் தந்திருக்கிறது."

உண்மை தான். 2G, மணல் கொள்ளை, தரமற்ற ரேஷன் அரிசி, Power cut, மீனவர் துயரம், பாராட்டு விழாக்கள் என பல நலப்பணிகள். ஒவ்வொரு நலப்பணியிலும் நல்ல லாபம் கண்டனர். 
Click the link to read more about the welfare schemes:
http://madhusudhanand.blogspot.com/2011/01/change-we-need.html




"அ.தி.மு.கவோடு உடன்பாடு கண்ட சோனியா காந்தி எத்தகைய கொடுமையான விமர்சனங்களுக்கு ஆளானார் என்பதனை எவரும் மறந்திருக்கமாட்டார்கள்."

இப்போ எல்லாரும் சோனியாவை  புகழறாங்களா?

" பி.ஜே.பி. அரசுகளுக்கு முன்மாதிரியாக வழிகாட்டி யாக, கட்டாய மதமாற்றச் சட்டம் கொண்டு வந்தவரே செல்வி ஜெயலலிதாதான்."

அதில் என்ன தவறு கண்டீர்கள்? நல்லது  தானே. அதை எடுத்தது தான் தவறு.

"இன்றைக்கு அ.தி.மு.க. என்பது பி.ஜே.பியின் ஒரு கிளைதான். அந்தக் கழகம் ஆட்சிக்கு வரவேண்டும் என்பதில் இந்துத்துவா சக்திகள் ஆர்வம் கொள்ளத்தான் செய்யும்."

Sushma swaraj  said no alliance with AIADMK in TN. The alliance with ADMK is also welcome. Not only Hindutva, everyone who is concerned about nation, oppose DMK. To defeat DMK, they have faith in ADMK.

Most of the media supporting DMK. This may misguide people. I feel, somewhat neutral source is the internet like blogs, buzz, etc.

Statutory Warnings

"Cigarette smoking is injurious to health"-This is a statutory warning in cigarette packets. Similar warnings you can see in other tobacco products and alcoholic products. Government instructs to do so.

Does the Government has real concern on people? If so, it should have abolished such products from the country/state. But it did not do so. Moreover smoking affects the people around us too.

Some people argue that beer is good. Yes, of course it is good if you own a winery. It contains carbohydrates, sodium, etc along with alcohol. Though alcohol reduces stress, it creates addiction, depression, and affects the liver, and central nervous system. Researches show that medicines which contains alchohols/intoxicants create addiction. For example, those who use headcahe pills, would not get releived from headache unless they use it.

In campaign for Gujarat election, Congress copied the free television scheme from DMK. They could have implemented the elimination of  alcohol in the country which was done in Gujarat. They are ready to copy a scheme to win in election, but could not use a good method for people's welfare, at least by seeing a state doing it. This shows how much concern does Congress have over the people.

People consider smoking or drinking as a style these days. They argue that as their freedom. To make man live in a correct way which is beneficial for himself and for the society, culture has evolved. If we can live as we like, then what is the difference between man and an animal. Movies projects drinking, or smoking, thereby creating temptations in hearts of people. The statutory warning appears here too, which is of no use.

According to Supreme court of India,

"...film motivates thought and action and assures a high degree of attention and retention as compared to the printed word. The combination of act and speech, sight and sound in semi darkness of the theatre with elimination of all distracting ideas will have a strong impact on the minds of the viewers and can affect emotions. Therefore, it has as much potential for evil as it has for good and has an equal potential to instill or cultivate violent or good behaviour. It cannot be equated with other modes of communication."

But they do not care about the people. At most they have given statutory warnings and certification for films. Nowadays it is becoming more liberal. It should change. People's welfare is very goal of the government and society.

People smoke in public places, caring about none around them. Do they dare to smoke in their house in front of their children? So, Do they mean, their family members should not be affected, but others can be affected? What a selfishness!

As individuals we can stop such habits and help the welfare of society.

Jaihind

Timing by Vaariyaar

It was an evening. The temple was crowded. People were eager to listen to Krubaananda Vaariyaar. He used to say some devotional stories in temples. That day too he was doing so.

He wants the people to listen to him. But how to confirm it? He do ask some questions in the middle of his speech. He will prefer to ask children. That day too, he pointed a boy, may be of 10.

The question is, "Who is the father of Muruga?". Last night the boy had seen the movie 'Thiuvilaiyaadal'. Don't know whether he understood the story, but attracted by the acting of 'Nadigar Thilagam', Sivaji Ganesan. Even if someone says the about Kattabomman, Sivaji as Kattabomman comes to our mind. His acting attracts everyone.

The boy answered Sivaji. The people started laughing. Vaariyaar asked,"Why are you laughing? His answer is correct". He explained,"There is a practise in North, in order to give respect they used to refer them by adding a 'ji' after their name, say Gandhiji, etc. I think, he too wished to give respect to Lord Siva."